Sviatoslav Timashev, N.A. Lavrov


The paper describes the results of assessing reliability of spacecraft cantilever
structures (SCS) that serve as supports of radio reflectors. The specifics of SCS reliability is that they should be capable of serving 12-15 years in space without changing their 3D geometry.
Results of reliability calculation of two types of lattice cantilever carbon polymer beams are presented. Further needed research is suggested.

Полный текст:

Статья в формате PDF


Jin. Y. B.-S. Jang Probabilistic fire risk analysis and structural safety assessment of FPSO topside module Ocean Engineering 104 (2015) 725–737.

Tsai. S-F. et al. Integrated self-assessment module for fire rescue safety in a chemical plant –A case study.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 51 (2018) 137–149.

Orozco. J.L et al. Assessment of an ammonia incident in the industrial area of Matanzas. Journal of Cleaner Production 222 (2019) 934-941.

SHAO Hui and DUAN Guoning 2012 International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology Risk quantitative calculation and ALOHA simulation on the leakage accident of natural gas power plant .Procedia Engineering 45 ( 2012 ) 352 – 359.

Ghana gas explosion 'kills five' in Accra: Accessed 21 September. 2019.

Khan. F. I.; Amyotte. P. R. Modeling of BP Texas City refinery incident. J. Loss. Prev. Process Ind. 2007. 20. 387−395.

Rothermel. R.C.. 1991. Predicting Behavior and Size of crown Fires in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Res. Pap. INT-438. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Ogden. UT. pp. 46.

Rothermel. R.C.. 1972. A Mathematical Model for Predicting Fire Spread in Wildland Fuels. Res. Pap. INT- 115. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Ogden. UT. pp. 40.

van Wagner. C.E.. 1977. Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire. Can. J. For. Res. 7 (1). 23–34.

N. Khakzad et al. Quantitative assessment of wildfire risk in oil facilities. Journal of Environmental Management 223 (2018) 433–443.

Khakzad. N.. Khan. F.. Amyotte. P.. Cozzani. V.. 2013. Domino effect analysis using bayesian networks. Risk Anal. 33 (2). 292–306. 1539-6924.2012.01854.x.

Reniers. G.. 2010. An external domino effects investment approach to improving cross-plant safety within. chemical clusters. J. Hazard. Mater. 177 (1–3). 167–174.

Abdolhamidzadeh. B.. Abbasi. T.. Rashtchian. D.. Abbasi. S.A.. 2011. Domino effect in process-industry accidents - an inventory of past events and the identification of some patterns. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.. 06.013.

M.Z. Kamil et al. Dynamic domino effect risk assessment using Petri-nets. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 124 (2019) 308–316

Bahareh. I.. Berrin. T.. 2015. Explosion impacts during transport of hazardous cargo: GIS-based characterization of overpressure impacts and delineation of flammable zones for ammonia. J. Environ. Manag. 156. 1-9.

Shah. T.R.. Tausif. S.. Sultana. R.S.. 2014. Facility layout optimization of on ammonia plant based on risk and economic analysis. In: 10th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering. ICME 2013. Proceedia Engineering. pp. 760–765.

VR R. Madhu G. Individual and societal risk analysis and mapping of human vulnerability to chemical accidents in the vicinity of an industrial area.

ENERGY COMMISSION ACT. 1997 15 June. 2019

Ding L. Khan F. Abbassi R. Ji J. FSEM: an approach to model contribution of synergistic effect of fires for domino effects. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2019 Sep;189:271-8.

Khakzad N. Khan F. Amyotte P. Cozzani V. Domino effect analysis using Bayesian networks. Risk Analysis: An International Journal. 2013 Feb;33(2):292-306.

Alileche N. Olivier D. Estel L. Cozzani V. Analysis of domino effect in the process industry using the event tree method. Safety science. 2017 Aug 1;97:10-9.

Cozzani V. Tugnoli A. Salzano E. Prevention of domino effect: From active and passive strategies to inherently safer design. Journal of hazardous materials. 2007 Jan 10;139(2):209-19.

Khan FI. Abbasi SA. Major accidents in process industries and an analysis of causes and consequences. Journal of Loss Prevention in the process Industries. 1999 Sep 1;12(5):361-78.

Khan FI. Abbasi SA. An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence. and the damage potential of domino effect (chain of accidents) in a typical cluster of industries. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2001 Jul 1;14(4):283-306.

ALOHA software program ( date accessed 15 June. 2019

Tsai SF. Huang AC. Shu CM. Integrated self-assessment module for fire rescue safety in a chemical plant–A case study. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2018 Jan 1;51:137-49.

Chevron Management Failures Led to Massive August 2012 Explosion in Richmond ( date accessed 17-06-2019

Deadly Kiev fuel blasts set off blaze near military unit ( date accessed 17-06-2019

One injured as massive Kemaman refinery blaze continues to rage [NSTTV] ( date accessed 18-06-2019.

Texas petrochemical fire spreads to more storage tanks after firefighting snag ( date accessed 20-06-2019.

Philadelphia Oil Refinery Explosion Shakes City With Huge Fireball ( date accessed 23-06-2019.

Xu C. Tarko AP. Wang W. Liu P. Predicting crash likelihood and severity on freeways with real-time loop detector data. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2013 Aug 1;57:30-9.

Mohsin M. Zhou P. Iqbal N. Shah SA. Assessing oil supply security of South Asia. Energy. 2018 Jul 15;155:438-47.

Bahr NJ. System safety engineering and risk assessment: a practical approach. CRC press; 2018 Oct 8.

Wind rose Tema.Greater Accra Region. Ghana. 5.670° N 0.017° W. 27 m asl ( date accessed 02-07-2019

CPR 18E. 1999. Commission for Prevention of Disasters. Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment. Purple Book. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Ministry of Transport. Public Works and Water Management. Ministry of Housing. Spatial Planning and the Environment. The Hague. The Netherlands.

Antonioni G. Spadoni G. Cozzani V. Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2009 Sep 1;22(5):614-24.

Yaofang F. Shuzhe C. Jing C. Research on virtual reality simulation system of safe navigation environment in Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2011 Jan 1;10:331-6.

Taghehbaf. M. A.. Givehchi. S.. Ardestani. M.. & Baghvand. A. (2014). Modeling the Consequences of Potential Accidents in One of the Gasoline Storage Tanks at Oil Storage of Yazd. in Terms of Explosion. 557-559.

Kardell L. Lööf M. QRA with respect to domino effects and property damage. Gas. 2014;50(300):1000.

Reniers GL. Dullaert W. DomPrevPlanning©: User-friendly software for planning domino effects prevention. Safety Science. 2007 Dec 1;45(10):1060-81.

Cozzani V. Antonioni G. Landucci G. Tugnoli A. Bonvicini S. Spadoni G. Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2014 Apr 11;28:10-22.

FLACS Software ( date accessed 15-10-2019.

PHAST and SAFETI - DNV GL Software program ( date accessed 15-10-2019.

TOXI+Risk Software program ( date accessed 15-10-2019.


  • На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.

(c) 2022 S.A. Timashev, N.A. Lavrov